Dynamic Ontology Launch Announcement
Twitter/X Thread
Tweet 1: Just shipped Dynamic Ontology - a schema-first approach to knowledge graphs that actually works.
No vector embeddings. No expensive ML. Just your documents + automata + coverage signals.
Here's what makes it different...
Tweet 2: The problem with knowledge graphs: you build one but have no idea if it's working.
Dynamic Ontology solves this with Coverage Signals - continuous quality governance that tells you exactly how well your extraction is performing.
Tweet 3: We tested on 1,013 documents:
- 4,090 domain terms extracted
- Real concepts identified (ontology, schema, inference, entity)
- Quality measurable and actionable
Coverage: 70%+ = proceed, <20% = rethink approach
Tweet 4: Built with Rust feature gates so you only pay for what you need:
ontology- core generic types (default)medical- medical entity typeshgnc- gene normalization (EGFR, TP53, KRAS...)
Tweet 5: The best part: no vector embeddings required. Uses existing Aho-Corasick + fuzzy matching. Fast, deterministic, explainable.
Docs: https://github.com/terraphim/terraphim-ai/tree/main/docs/src/dynamic-ontology.md
Star us to follow the journey.
LinkedIn Post
Excited to announce Dynamic Ontology - a practical approach to knowledge graphs that makes extraction quality visible.
After months of research and implementation, we've shipped a schema-first methodology that:
- Extracts entities from your existing documents
- Builds ontology automatically
- Measures coverage continuously
- Grounds entities to canonical URIs
The key insight? You don't need vector embeddings. The existing automata (Aho-Corasick + fuzzy matching) combined with graph ranking does the job - faster, cheaper, and more explainable.
We tested on 1,013 documents and extracted 4,090 domain-specific terms. The system correctly identifies concepts like "knowledge graphs", "ontology", "schema", and "inference" - and importantly, tells you when it's missing something.
Coverage signals provide continuous governance:
- 70%+ coverage = ready to use
- 40-70% = minor review needed
- <20% = different approach needed
Built with Rust feature gates for flexibility - enable medical types or HGNC gene normalization when you need it.
Check out the docs and example in our GitHub repo.
#KnowledgeGraph #AI #DataScience #Rust
Hacker News Submission
Title: Dynamic Ontology: Schema-first knowledge graphs without vector embeddings
Body: We've been working on a practical approach to knowledge graphs that doesn't require expensive vector embeddings or perfect schema design upfront.
Key features:
- Extract entities from documents automatically
- Build ontology from your corpus
- Coverage signals measure extraction quality
- No ML infrastructure needed
The insight: existing Aho-Corasick automata + fuzzy matching handles normalization fine. What we needed was a feedback loop - coverage signals that tell you what you're missing so you can expand intelligently.
Tested on 1,013 documents - 4,090 terms extracted, domain concepts identified correctly.
https://github.com/terraphim/terraphim-ai/tree/main/docs/src/dynamic-ontology.md
GitHub Release Notes
Dynamic Ontology v1.4
We're excited to announce Dynamic Ontology - a schema-first approach to knowledge graph construction.
What's New
- GroundingMetadata - Canonical URIs for normalized entities
- CoverageSignal - Quality governance signals
- SchemaSignal - Entity extraction with confidence scores
- HgncNormalizer - Gene normalization (EGFR, TP53, KRAS, etc.)
Feature Gates
| Feature | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| ontology | Core generic types (default) |
| medical | Medical entity types |
| hgnc | HGNC gene normalization |
Example
Documentation
See docs/src/dynamic-ontology.md for full documentation.
Breaking Changes
ExtractedEntity.entity_typeis nowString(was enum) - enables cross-domain useExtractedRelationship.relationship_typeis nowString(was enum)- Medical types moved to feature-gated
EntityType/RelationshipTypeenums
For additional announcement formats or localization, let me know.