Terraphim AI documentation

Terraphim AI Agent Evolution System - Testing Matrix

Overview

This document provides a comprehensive testing matrix for the Terraphim AI Agent Evolution System, covering all components, workflow patterns, integration scenarios, and quality assurance measures.

Testing Strategy

Testing Pyramid

graph TD
    A[End-to-End Tests] --> B[Integration Tests]
    B --> C[Unit Tests]

    A --> A1[5 Workflow Pattern E2E Tests]
    A --> A2[Cross-Pattern Integration]
    A --> A3[Evolution System E2E]

    B --> B1[Component Integration]
    B --> B2[LLM Adapter Integration]
    B --> B3[Persistence Integration]

    C --> C1[Component Unit Tests]
    C --> C2[Workflow Pattern Tests]
    C --> C3[Utility Function Tests]

Test Categories

| Category | Purpose | Coverage | Automation Level | |----------|---------|----------|------------------| | Unit Tests | Component functionality | 95%+ | Fully Automated | | Integration Tests | Component interaction | 85%+ | Fully Automated | | End-to-End Tests | Complete workflows | 100% scenarios | Fully Automated | | Performance Tests | Scalability & speed | Key scenarios | Automated | | Chaos Tests | Failure resilience | Error scenarios | Automated |

Component Testing Matrix

Core Evolution System

| Component | Unit Tests | Integration Tests | E2E Tests | Performance Tests | |-----------|------------|------------------|-----------|------------------| | AgentEvolutionSystem | ✅ 5 tests | ✅ 3 tests | ✅ 2 scenarios | ✅ Load test | | VersionedMemory | ✅ 12 tests | ✅ 4 tests | ✅ 3 scenarios | ✅ Memory stress | | VersionedTaskList | ✅ 15 tests | ✅ 5 tests | ✅ 4 scenarios | ✅ Concurrent tasks | | VersionedLessons | ✅ 10 tests | ✅ 3 tests | ✅ 3 scenarios | ✅ Learning efficiency | | MemoryEvolutionViewer | ✅ 8 tests | ✅ 2 tests | ✅ 2 scenarios | ✅ Query performance |

Current Test Coverage: 40 unit tests across evolution components

Workflow Patterns Testing

| Pattern | Unit Tests | Integration Tests | E2E Tests | Performance Tests | Chaos Tests | |---------|------------|------------------|-----------|------------------|-------------| | Prompt Chaining | ✅ 6 tests | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | | Routing | ✅ 5 tests | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | | Parallelization | ✅ 4 tests | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | | Orchestrator-Workers | ✅ 3 tests | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | | Evaluator-Optimizer | ✅ 4 tests | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing | ❌ Missing |

Gap Analysis: Missing integration and E2E tests for all workflow patterns

LLM Integration Testing

| Component | Unit Tests | Integration Tests | Mock Tests | Live Tests | |-----------|------------|------------------|------------|------------| | LlmAdapter Trait | ✅ 3 tests | ✅ 2 tests | ✅ Complete | ❓ Optional | | MockLlmAdapter | ✅ 3 tests | ✅ 2 tests | ✅ Self-testing | ❌ N/A | | LlmAdapterFactory | ✅ 2 tests | ✅ 1 test | ✅ Complete | ❌ Missing |

Test Scenarios by Workflow Pattern

1. Prompt Chaining Test Scenarios

| Test ID | Scenario | Test Type | Status | Priority | |---------|----------|-----------|--------|----------| | PC-E2E-001 | Analysis Chain Execution | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | PC-E2E-002 | Generation Chain Execution | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | PC-E2E-003 | Problem-Solving Chain | E2E | ❌ Missing | Medium | | PC-INT-001 | Step Failure Recovery | Integration | ❌ Missing | High | | PC-INT-002 | Context Preservation | Integration | ❌ Missing | High | | PC-PERF-001 | Chain Performance Scaling | Performance | ❌ Missing | Medium | | PC-CHAOS-001 | Mid-Chain LLM Failure | Chaos | ❌ Missing | Medium |

Required Test Cases

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_prompt_chaining_analysis_e2e() {
    // Test complete analysis chain execution
    let adapter = LlmAdapterFactory::create_mock("test");
    let chaining = PromptChaining::new(adapter);

    let workflow_input = create_analysis_workflow_input();
    let result = chaining.execute(workflow_input).await.unwrap();

    // Verify execution trace has expected steps
    assert_eq!(result.execution_trace.len(), 3);
    assert_eq!(result.execution_trace[0].step_id, "extract_info");
    assert_eq!(result.execution_trace[1].step_id, "identify_patterns");
    assert_eq!(result.execution_trace[2].step_id, "synthesize_analysis");

    // Verify quality metrics
    assert!(result.metadata.quality_score.unwrap_or(0.0) > 0.7);
    assert!(result.metadata.success);
}

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_prompt_chaining_step_failure_recovery() {
    // Test recovery when middle step fails
    let adapter = create_failing_adapter_at_step(1); // Fail at step 2
    let chaining = PromptChaining::new(adapter);

    let workflow_input = create_test_workflow_input();
    let result = chaining.execute(workflow_input).await;

    // Should handle failure gracefully
    assert!(result.is_ok());
    assert!(result.unwrap().execution_trace.iter().any(|s| !s.success));
}

2. Routing Test Scenarios

| Test ID | Scenario | Test Type | Status | Priority | |---------|----------|-----------|--------|----------| | RT-E2E-001 | Cost-Optimized Routing | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | RT-E2E-002 | Performance-Optimized Routing | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | RT-E2E-003 | Quality-Optimized Routing | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | RT-INT-001 | Route Selection Logic | Integration | ❌ Missing | High | | RT-INT-002 | Fallback Strategy | Integration | ❌ Missing | Critical | | RT-PERF-001 | Route Decision Speed | Performance | ❌ Missing | Medium | | RT-CHAOS-001 | Primary Route Failure | Chaos | ❌ Missing | High |

Required Test Cases

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_routing_cost_optimization_e2e() {
    let primary = LlmAdapterFactory::create_mock("expensive");
    let mut routing = Routing::new(primary);

    routing = routing
        .add_route("cheap", create_cheap_adapter(), 0.1, 0.8)
        .add_route("expensive", create_expensive_adapter(), 0.9, 0.95);

    let simple_task = create_simple_workflow_input();
    let result = routing.execute(simple_task).await.unwrap();

    // Should select cheap route for simple task
    assert!(result.metadata.resources_used.cost_per_execution < 0.2);
}

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_routing_fallback_strategy() {
    let primary = create_failing_adapter();
    let mut routing = Routing::new(primary);

    routing = routing.add_route("fallback", create_working_adapter(), 0.3, 0.8);

    let workflow_input = create_test_workflow_input();
    let result = routing.execute(workflow_input).await;

    // Should succeed using fallback route
    assert!(result.is_ok());
    assert_eq!(result.unwrap().metadata.pattern_used, "routing");
}

3. Parallelization Test Scenarios

| Test ID | Scenario | Test Type | Status | Priority | |---------|----------|-----------|--------|----------| | PL-E2E-001 | Comparison Task Parallelization | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | PL-E2E-002 | Research Task Parallelization | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | PL-E2E-003 | Generation Task Parallelization | E2E | ❌ Missing | Medium | | PL-INT-001 | Result Aggregation Strategies | Integration | ❌ Missing | High | | PL-INT-002 | Failure Threshold Handling | Integration | ❌ Missing | High | | PL-PERF-001 | Parallel Execution Scaling | Performance | ❌ Missing | High | | PL-CHAOS-001 | Partial Task Failures | Chaos | ❌ Missing | Medium |

Required Test Cases

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_parallelization_comparison_e2e() {
    let adapter = LlmAdapterFactory::create_mock("test");
    let config = ParallelConfig {
        max_parallel_tasks: 3,
        aggregation_strategy: AggregationStrategy::Synthesis,
        ..Default::default()
    };
    let parallelization = Parallelization::with_config(adapter, config);

    let comparison_input = create_comparison_workflow_input();
    let result = parallelization.execute(comparison_input).await.unwrap();

    // Should create comparison-specific parallel tasks
    assert!(result.execution_trace.len() >= 3);
    assert!(result.execution_trace.iter().any(|s| s.step_id.contains("comparison")));
    assert!(result.execution_trace.iter().any(|s| s.step_id.contains("pros_cons")));
}

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_parallelization_failure_threshold() {
    let adapter = create_partially_failing_adapter(0.6); // 60% failure rate
    let config = ParallelConfig {
        failure_threshold: 0.5, // Need 50% success
        ..Default::default()
    };
    let parallelization = Parallelization::with_config(adapter, config);

    let workflow_input = create_test_workflow_input();
    let result = parallelization.execute(workflow_input).await;

    // Should fail due to not meeting threshold
    assert!(result.is_err());
}

4. Orchestrator-Workers Test Scenarios

| Test ID | Scenario | Test Type | Status | Priority | |---------|----------|-----------|--------|----------| | OW-E2E-001 | Sequential Worker Execution | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | OW-E2E-002 | Parallel Coordinated Execution | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | OW-E2E-003 | Complex Multi-Role Project | E2E | ❌ Missing | Medium | | OW-INT-001 | Execution Plan Generation | Integration | ❌ Missing | High | | OW-INT-002 | Quality Gate Evaluation | Integration | ❌ Missing | Critical | | OW-INT-003 | Worker Role Specialization | Integration | ❌ Missing | Medium | | OW-PERF-001 | Large Team Coordination | Performance | ❌ Missing | Medium | | OW-CHAOS-001 | Worker Failure Recovery | Chaos | ❌ Missing | High |

Required Test Cases

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_orchestrator_workers_sequential_e2e() {
    let orchestrator_adapter = LlmAdapterFactory::create_mock("orchestrator");
    let orchestrator = OrchestratorWorkers::new(orchestrator_adapter)
        .add_worker(WorkerRole::Analyst, create_analyst_adapter())
        .add_worker(WorkerRole::Writer, create_writer_adapter())
        .add_worker(WorkerRole::Reviewer, create_reviewer_adapter());

    let complex_input = create_complex_workflow_input();
    let result = orchestrator.execute(complex_input).await.unwrap();

    // Should have execution plan and worker results
    assert!(result.execution_trace.len() >= 4); // Plan + 3 workers
    assert!(result.execution_trace.iter().any(|s| s.step_id == "orchestrator_planning"));
    assert!(result.execution_trace.iter().any(|s| s.step_id.contains("analysis_task")));
    assert!(result.execution_trace.iter().any(|s| s.step_id.contains("writing_task")));
}

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_orchestrator_workers_quality_gate() {
    let orchestrator_adapter = LlmAdapterFactory::create_mock("orchestrator");
    let config = OrchestrationConfig {
        quality_gate_threshold: 0.8, // High quality threshold
        ..Default::default()
    };
    let orchestrator = OrchestratorWorkers::with_config(orchestrator_adapter, config)
        .add_worker(WorkerRole::Analyst, create_low_quality_adapter()); // Will fail quality gate

    let workflow_input = create_test_workflow_input();
    let result = orchestrator.execute(workflow_input).await;

    // Should fail due to quality gate
    assert!(result.is_err());
    assert!(result.unwrap_err().to_string().contains("Quality gate failed"));
}

5. Evaluator-Optimizer Test Scenarios

| Test ID | Scenario | Test Type | Status | Priority | |---------|----------|-----------|--------|----------| | EO-E2E-001 | Iterative Quality Improvement | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | EO-E2E-002 | Early Stopping on Quality | E2E | ❌ Missing | High | | EO-E2E-003 | Maximum Iterations Reached | E2E | ❌ Missing | Medium | | EO-INT-001 | Evaluation Criteria Scoring | Integration | ❌ Missing | High | | EO-INT-002 | Optimization Strategy Selection | Integration | ❌ Missing | High | | EO-INT-003 | Improvement Threshold Logic | Integration | ❌ Missing | Medium | | EO-PERF-001 | Optimization Convergence | Performance | ❌ Missing | Medium | | EO-CHAOS-001 | Evaluation Failure Recovery | Chaos | ❌ Missing | Medium |

Required Test Cases

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_evaluator_optimizer_improvement_e2e() {
    let adapter = LlmAdapterFactory::create_mock("test");
    let config = OptimizationConfig {
        max_iterations: 3,
        quality_threshold: 0.85,
        improvement_threshold: 0.05,
        ..Default::default()
    };
    let evaluator = EvaluatorOptimizer::with_config(adapter, config);

    let quality_critical_input = create_quality_critical_workflow_input();
    let result = evaluator.execute(quality_critical_input).await.unwrap();

    // Should show iterative improvement
    assert!(result.metadata.quality_score.unwrap_or(0.0) >= 0.85);
    assert!(result.execution_trace.len() >= 2); // Initial + at least one optimization
    assert!(result.execution_trace.iter().any(|s| s.step_id.contains("optimization_iteration")));
}

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_evaluator_optimizer_early_stopping() {
    let adapter = create_high_quality_adapter(); // Produces good output immediately
    let config = OptimizationConfig {
        quality_threshold: 0.8,
        early_stopping: true,
        ..Default::default()
    };
    let evaluator = EvaluatorOptimizer::with_config(adapter, config);

    let workflow_input = create_test_workflow_input();
    let result = evaluator.execute(workflow_input).await.unwrap();

    // Should stop early when quality threshold is met
    assert!(result.execution_trace.len() <= 2); // Initial generation + possible evaluation
    assert!(result.metadata.quality_score.unwrap_or(0.0) >= 0.8);
}

Integration Testing Matrix

Evolution System Integration

| Integration Scenario | Test ID | Status | Priority | |---------------------|---------|--------|----------| | Workflow → Memory Update | EVO-INT-001 | ❌ Missing | Critical | | Workflow → Task Tracking | EVO-INT-002 | ❌ Missing | Critical | | Workflow → Lesson Learning | EVO-INT-003 | ❌ Missing | Critical | | Cross-Pattern Transitions | EVO-INT-004 | ❌ Missing | High | | Evolution State Snapshots | EVO-INT-005 | ❌ Missing | High | | Long-term Evolution Tracking | EVO-INT-006 | ❌ Missing | Medium |

Critical Integration Tests

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_workflow_memory_integration() {
    let mut manager = EvolutionWorkflowManager::new("test_agent".to_string());

    let result = manager.execute_task(
        "memory_test".to_string(),
        "Analyze user behavior patterns".to_string(),
        Some("Focus on learning preferences".to_string()),
    ).await.unwrap();

    // Verify memory was updated
    let memory_state = manager.evolution_system().memory_evolution.current_state();
    assert!(!memory_state.short_term_memories.is_empty());

    // Verify task was tracked
    let tasks_state = manager.evolution_system().tasks_evolution.current_state();
    assert_eq!(tasks_state.completed_tasks(), 1);

    // Verify lesson was learned
    let lessons_state = manager.evolution_system().lessons_evolution.current_state();
    assert!(!lessons_state.success_patterns.is_empty());
}

#[tokio::test]
async fn test_cross_pattern_transitions() {
    let mut manager = EvolutionWorkflowManager::new("test_agent".to_string());

    // Execute simple task (should use routing)
    let simple_result = manager.execute_task(
        "simple_task".to_string(),
        "What is 2+2?".to_string(),
        None,
    ).await.unwrap();

    // Execute complex task (should use orchestrator-workers or parallelization)
    let complex_result = manager.execute_task(
        "complex_task".to_string(),
        "Analyze the comprehensive impact of climate change on global economics".to_string(),
        None,
    ).await.unwrap();

    // Verify different patterns were used
    assert_ne!(simple_result, complex_result);

    // Verify evolution system learned from both experiences
    let lessons = manager.evolution_system().lessons_evolution.current_state();
    assert!(lessons.success_patterns.len() >= 2);
}

Performance Testing Matrix

Scalability Tests

| Component | Metric | Target | Current | Status | |-----------|--------|--------|---------|---------| | Memory Operations | Memory entries/sec | 1000+ | ❓ Unknown | ❌ Missing | | Task Management | Concurrent tasks | 100+ | ❓ Unknown | ❌ Missing | | Lesson Storage | Lessons/sec | 500+ | ❓ Unknown | ❌ Missing | | Workflow Execution | Workflows/min | 50+ | ❓ Unknown | ❌ Missing | | Pattern Selection | Selection time | <100ms | ❓ Unknown | ❌ Missing |

Resource Usage Tests

| Resource | Metric | Target | Test Status | |----------|--------|--------|-------------| | Memory Usage | Peak RAM | <500MB per agent | ❌ Missing | | CPU Usage | Peak CPU | <80% under load | ❌ Missing | | Storage I/O | Persistence ops/sec | 1000+ | ❌ Missing | | Network I/O | LLM calls/min | 100+ | ❌ Missing |

Chaos Engineering Tests

Failure Scenarios

| Scenario | Test ID | Impact | Recovery | Status | |----------|---------|--------|----------|---------| | LLM Adapter Failure | CHAOS-001 | High | Fallback routing | ❌ Missing | | Persistence Layer Failure | CHAOS-002 | Critical | Memory fallback | ❌ Missing | | Memory Corruption | CHAOS-003 | Medium | State recovery | ❌ Missing | | Partial Network Failure | CHAOS-004 | Medium | Retry logic | ❌ Missing | | Resource Exhaustion | CHAOS-005 | High | Graceful degradation | ❌ Missing |

Test Data and Fixtures

Test Input Scenarios

// Standard test inputs for workflow patterns
pub fn create_simple_workflow_input() -> WorkflowInput {
    WorkflowInput {
        task_id: "simple_task".to_string(),
        agent_id: "test_agent".to_string(),
        prompt: "What is the capital of France?".to_string(),
        context: None,
        parameters: WorkflowParameters::default(),
        timestamp: Utc::now(),
    }
}

pub fn create_complex_workflow_input() -> WorkflowInput {
    WorkflowInput {
        task_id: "complex_task".to_string(),
        agent_id: "test_agent".to_string(),
        prompt: "Analyze the comprehensive economic, social, and environmental impacts of renewable energy adoption in developing countries, including policy recommendations".to_string(),
        context: Some("Focus on solar and wind energy technologies".to_string()),
        parameters: WorkflowParameters::default(),
        timestamp: Utc::now(),
    }
}

pub fn create_comparison_workflow_input() -> WorkflowInput {
    WorkflowInput {
        task_id: "comparison_task".to_string(),
        agent_id: "test_agent".to_string(),
        prompt: "Compare and contrast React vs Vue.js for building modern web applications".to_string(),
        context: None,
        parameters: WorkflowParameters::default(),
        timestamp: Utc::now(),
    }
}

Test Coverage Metrics

Current Coverage Status

pie title Test Coverage by Category
    "Unit Tests (Implemented)" : 40
    "Unit Tests (Missing)" : 10
    "Integration Tests (Implemented)" : 3
    "Integration Tests (Missing)" : 25
    "E2E Tests (Implemented)" : 3
    "E2E Tests (Missing)" : 20

Coverage Goals

| Test Type | Current | Target | Gap | |-----------|---------|--------|-----| | Unit Tests | 40 tests | 50 tests | 10 tests | | Integration Tests | 3 tests | 28 tests | 25 tests | | End-to-End Tests | 3 tests | 23 tests | 20 tests | | Performance Tests | 0 tests | 15 tests | 15 tests | | Chaos Tests | 0 tests | 12 tests | 12 tests |

Priority Test Implementation Order

  1. Critical (Implement First)

    • E2E tests for all 5 workflow patterns
    • Integration tests for evolution system
    • Failure recovery tests for routing pattern
    • Quality gate tests for orchestrator-workers

  2. High Priority (Implement Next)

    • Performance tests for parallel execution
    • Chaos tests for LLM adapter failures
    • Cross-pattern integration tests
    • Resource usage monitoring tests

  3. Medium Priority (Implement Later)

    • Advanced chaos engineering scenarios
    • Long-term evolution tracking tests
    • Optimization convergence tests
    • Memory leak detection tests

Test Automation and CI/CD

Automated Test Execution

# GitHub Actions workflow for testing
name: Comprehensive Testing

on: [push, pull_request]

jobs:
  unit-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - name: Run Unit Tests
        run: cargo test --workspace --lib

  integration-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - name: Run Integration Tests
        run: cargo test --workspace --test '*'

  e2e-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - name: Run E2E Tests
        run: cargo test --workspace --test '*e2e*'

  performance-tests:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    if: github.event_name == 'push' && github.ref == 'refs/heads/main'
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v3
      - name: Run Performance Tests
        run: cargo test --workspace --test '*performance*' --release

Test Quality Gates

| Gate | Criteria | Action on Failure | |------|----------|------------------| | Unit Test Gate | 100% unit tests pass | Block merge | | Integration Gate | 100% integration tests pass | Block merge | | Coverage Gate | >90% code coverage | Warning | | Performance Gate | No regression >20% | Block merge | | Chaos Gate | All failure scenarios recover | Warning |

Test Maintenance

Regular Test Review Process

  1. Weekly: Review failed tests and flaky test patterns
  2. Monthly: Update test scenarios based on new features
  3. Quarterly: Performance test baseline updates
  4. Bi-annually: Complete test strategy review

Test Data Management

// Test data factory for consistent test scenarios
pub struct TestDataFactory;

impl TestDataFactory {
    pub fn create_agent_with_history(agent_id: &str) -> AgentEvolutionSystem {
        let mut system = AgentEvolutionSystem::new(agent_id.to_string());

        // Add realistic test data
        system.memory_evolution.add_short_term_memory(
            "test_mem_001".to_string(),
            "Test memory content".to_string(),
            "Test context".to_string(),
            vec!["test".to_string()],
        ).unwrap();

        system
    }

    pub fn create_test_scenarios() -> Vec<WorkflowInput> {
        vec![
            Self::simple_task(),
            Self::complex_task(),
            Self::comparison_task(),
            Self::research_task(),
            Self::creative_task(),
        ]
    }
}

This comprehensive testing matrix ensures that all aspects of the Terraphim AI Agent Evolution System are thoroughly tested, from individual components to complete end-to-end workflows, providing confidence in system reliability and quality.

Testing Overview TypeScript Bindings with tsify